Quantcast
Channel: Cadence RF Design Forum
Viewing all 956 articles
Browse latest View live

Concatenated vectors of strings are truncated when the circuit is being graphed by a measurement, but vectors of integers work fine.

$
0
0

This is a very strange bug: If I create two parameters to a subcircuit, one a vector of strings and the other a vector of integers and then call concat() in the subcircuit, then it works properly on integers but only gets the first element of the vector for strings.

Notice in the first image it works: the S2 circuit shows B:{0, 1, 2, 3} and X:{"a", "b", "c"}.  In the second image, all I have done is disable the measurement that graphs S1: Notice that the integer is still correct, but the string vector only passed the first vector element, "b" showing as X:{"a", "b"}.  Additionally, "W" is no longer showing as a vector at all, it is simply W: "b".  I have also attached the .emz below.

In both cases there are no warnings or errors, and the measurement is simply a graph of S21, none of the parameterized variables passed to the subcircuit are subject to the graph:

Working, measurement disabled:

Not Working, measurement enabled:

Here's the emz:

community.cadence.com/.../Subcircuit-Parameter-String-Test.zip


Error When trying to Import the subcircuit Spice model into Cadence

$
0
0

Hi, 

Hope you are doing fine. I have read the forum and the post Tawna made here: https://community.cadence.com/cadence_blogs_8/b/rf/posts/tip-of-the-week-how-to-simulate-a-subcircuit-netlist-with-spectre-in-ade

I tried to import the Spice model into the Cadence based on that instructions but I cannot follow from the third step as it is totally different in my Cadence version probably. But I got the idea from the instructions and created a spiceText cellview, then saved it and it automatically created the symbol for me based on the pins and terminals. Then I am trying to use this symbol in another schematic to do some SP analysis in schematic. But, at the very first point I get the error for creating the netlist, so do you have any suggestion how can I import this amplifier spice model into my library (I have also attached my CDF menu screen shot which is different from what is mentioned in the instructions by Tawna): 

"generate netlist...

function ansCdlCompPrim redefined

function ansCdlCompPrim redefined

Begin Incremental Netlisting Mar 22 16:34:00 2021

ERROR (OSSHNL-116): Unable to descend into any of the views defined in the view list, 'spectre veriloga ahdl cmos_sch schematic', for the

instance 'I0' in cell 'PAD115_tb'. Add one of these views to the cell 'PAD115' in the

library 'Non_Foster_Circuit', or modify the view list so that it contains an existing view.

End netlisting Mar 22 16:34:00 2021

ERROR (OSSHNL-514): Netlist generation failed because of the errors reported above. The netlist might not have been generated at all, or the generated netlist could be corrupt. Fix the reported errors and regenerate the netlist.

      ...unsuccessful."

Problem Simulating Noise Figure of Gm Cell (single Ended)

$
0
0

Hi,

I was trying to simulate the NF of simple Inverter (Which I will use as a gm-cell at the output of my switch-cap passive mixer). Unfortunately I am getting NF=46.48 dB for my circuit.

I have attached the necessary Photos of my circuit.  

Could anyone help me out regarding this?

Thanks

Problem of Nport PSS shooting simulation

$
0
0

Hello,

I have some problem when doing the PSS/PAC/PSP simulation with Nport from the analoglib.

I'm using Spectre Version 19.1.0.373.isr7 64bit and Virtuoso IC6.1.8-64b.

I wrote a S4P touchstone file to model an ideal IQ coupler and simulated it with Nport component from analoglib.

I tried PSS/PSP/PAC simulations with both shooting and HB engine.

The result of HB engine is correct, funtioning exactly as an ideal IQ coupler. While the result of shooting engine is completely wrong.

I used the PSS shooting engine for NPORT simulation with Spectre 14 and Virtuoso IC6.1.6 before. It works very well.

I wonder whether there is a way to get NPORT works with PSS shooting engine in the new Spectre/Virtuoso version.

For the Nport setup, I  tried nearly all the options for passivity, causilty, interpolation methods.

One weird thing is that no matter which interpolation methods I chose (linear, rational), the final fitting is always based on BBspice.

Any comment is appreciated. Thank you.

 

Best regards,

Yang

conversion of a schematic to a touchstone file

$
0
0

Hello , 

I am a beginner using AWR Cadence and I would like to ask you if it is possible to convert a 2-port schematic into an S2P file using AWR Cadence..

Thank you i advance for your help .

Ameny 

ISF Function from PPV & plotting various PPVs

$
0
0

Hi 

I am new to Cadence environment. And trying to plot ISF in Cadence. 

Firstly, is there any paper that describes the relationship between them? Because the ones I found are mathematically rigorous and not very practical/hands on? 

Second, when Cadence does save ppv plots in a binary file (after the save ppv option is enabled in pnoise), are the ppv plots saved for "each node" of circuit? Maybe for passives as well?

Thanks a ton for help

Generating a pulse signal with specific duty cycle using AWR Cadence

$
0
0

Hello everyone,

Is it possible to generate a pulse signal with a specific duty cycle and  with fixing th number of the pulses using AWR Cadence ? I searched in the previous questins in the Forum and there were answers for this question concerning Cadence virtuoso , not AWR cadence.

Thank you in advance for your time and your help. 

Regards,

Ameny

Question about DC convergence error in sweep simulation.

$
0
0

Hello, thank you in advance for your assistance.

I was making simple op-amp, but I used verilog-a based mosfet model (MIT-VS model).

To see DC operating point, I did DC simulation, and it seemed like the values settled on wrong point. (Results were not reasonable.)

However, when I did sweep simulation (sweep variable was temperature, which should be almost non-relative to the results), I found DC convergence result goes to correctly as simulations goes on. - This is also weird and I couldn't understand.

However, as dcOp still gives not reasonable values, so I cannot do other simulations like measuring AC gain.

I've already used nodeset, but it didn't worked.

Could anyone give me the solution how to apply dcOp to points that were gathered through sweep simulation, or to get appropriate DC results from the beginning?

Thank you so much

Best,

Dongsuk


limited OS parameters problem for creating ft formula

$
0
0

Hello,after plotting gm_id vs Vgs ,wen i tried to get another parameter it shows me a list of one parameter as shown bellow.

Where did i go wrong?
Thanks

HB AC warnings: Solver did not converge to the desired tolerance of 0.0001

$
0
0

I have been getting the following errors in my HB AC simulations. Would like to get some feedback on how to solve this.

Warning: Solver did not converge to the desired tolerance of 0.0001. It converged to 1. The solution may not be accurate but it's saved anyway.
hbac: freq = 23.1 GHz (1.25 %), step = 100 MHz (1.25 %)
Warning: Solver did not converge to the desired tolerance of 0.0001. It converged to 9.62543e-06. The solution may not be accurate but it's saved anyway.
hbac: freq = 23.2 GHz (2.5 %), step = 100 MHz (1.25 %)
Warning: Solver did not converge to the desired tolerance of 0.0001. It converged to 1.53487e-05. The solution may not be accurate but it's saved anyway.
hbac: freq = 23.3 GHz (3.75 %), step = 100 MHz (1.25 %)
Warning: Solver did not converge to the desired tolerance of 0.0001. It converged to 1.13937e-05. The solution may not be accurate but it's saved anyway.
hbac: freq = 23.4 GHz (5 %), step = 100 MHz (1.25 %)
hbac: freq = 23.5 GHz (6.25 %), step = 100 MHz (1.25 %)

Let me know if you need any further info on this.

Thanks

SJRG

expression vs OS param problem

$
0
0

Hello,I have tried to build an expression of ft vs gm as shown bellow,by defining on side by name then i have did wavevswave in calcularor.

It shows me the error shown in the end.
Where did i go wrong?
Thanks.





[AWR Microwave Office] Understanding the origin of losses in an EM structure

$
0
0

Good day,

My title is perhaps a little vague, but I wasn't sure how to phrase it. I'll try to make it clear in as few words as possible, although I think I'll have to explain at least a few of the aspects to make it clear.

I am using AWR Microwave Office to simulate a planar EM structure using the AXIEM simulator. The planar structure looks like this:

For scale, the central rounded rectangle is about 500um wide.

Now, it might be a bit of an unconventional shape (this work relates to superconducting qubit design). What we see here is essentially an LC circuit (the large island has C to ground, and hard to see is the little wiggle on the side, which forms the L to ground due to the reactance of the material). That LC circuit is capacitively coupled to a (50 Ohm) transmission line predominantly via the little extrusion in the center, and there are 50 Ohm Edge ports on either side of the transmission line. Also present, but at this point not doing much, is another floating metallic island above the LC circuit. It has no connection to ground, so it simply floats for now and has a C. As for the layer stack, there is 500um of lossless silicon below, the material itself is a lossless (super)conductor of no thickness (but with some inductive reactance), and above is 500um of lossless air.

With this structure I can run an S21 simulation, and I'll find this Lorentzian lineshape centered at the resonance frequency, which is about 6.4 GHz here. As may or may not be obvious to you, this lineshape has a width and depth, related to its quality factor, set by two contributions: the internal quality factor Qi and the coupling quality factor Qc. The first comes from losses intrinsic to the LC circuit, such as losses in the dielectrics (which are set to 0 here). The second comes from the fact that the circuit is coupled to the transmission line, which has its 50 Ohm ports, acting as dissipation channels. This coupling thus causes losses as well, captured by Qc. In an S21 measurement these two contributions can be separated; after all the Qc essentially sets how much the LC circuit radiates into the transmission line, while Qi sets how much is lost in an unmeasured channel.

What I thus do is export this S21 data (both magnitude and phase) and use expressions known for this effective geometry to find the value of Qi and Qc. For this simulation there are no internal losses, and consistent with that I find a Qc of about 1000, and a Qi of about 5e6; practically infinite compared to Qc and just a result of numerical accuracy. 

So far, so good! This is all consistent with my expectations, and in fact it turns out that if I make this structure in the lab, we get very similar numbers for the resonance frequency and Qc. Qi does turn out to be finite, but that is due to the lossy materials I have neglected.

But now we get to my actual question. In a next step, I add an additional structure to the design:

Added is another 50 Ohm impedance line (but currently without 50 Ohm port!), which ends up close to the floating island that (still) does essentially nothing. In practice it is intended as a way of sending microwaves to that structure, but for the purposes of this simulation, it is again just a floating piece of metal. Now, if I rerun the exact same simulation as above, I would expect to see more or less the same result; the new structure hardly influences the capacitances of the LC circuit and the transmission line. In fact, simulating these capacitances (I do not know how with AWR, so I used COMSOL), they are at least an order to 2 orders of magnitude smaller than any of the other relevant capacitances. So I would expect that most quantities are unchanged, with perhaps a small shift in the resonance frequency.

But what I find instead is that the structure has now apparently become 'lossy'; simulating S21 and fitting the lineshape, I now find that the lineshape has become much broader and more shallow. Fitting it there has to be a Qi of about 5000. 

My question is, where are these perceived losses coming from? Why did the lineshape become broader and more shallow? Everything is still lossless, so I don't understand. At first I thought it was related to grounding issues; this new line now breaks the ground plane. But to overcome this I added some 'bridges' across the line with vias, and the result remains largely unchanged. 

Does anyone have an idea for why this seems to happen? Maybe relevant to add is that my goal was to add another 50 Ohm edge port to that new structure (a port 3), and to find out exactly how much losses the LC circuit does get from its parasitic coupling to that port. Measuring S21 these would enter exactly into Qi, because they are losses into an unmonitored dissipation channel. But in the current iteration, that channel does not yet exist!

国外学历提升买文凭Q/微信29304199丹佛大学文凭DU毕业证成绩单学历认证修改GPA成绩雅思成绩单学位证书offer,在读证明/留信认证/WSE认证/University of Denver

$
0
0

国外学历提升买文凭Q/微信29304199丹佛大学文凭DU毕业证成绩单学历认证修改GPA成绩雅思成绩单学位证书offer,在读证明/留信认证/WSE认证/University of Denver

QQ/微信29304199办理毕业证,成绩单,教育部留信认证,使馆认证,回国人员证明,修改成绩单+信封申请学校,offer录取通知书,在读证明,大学学位证书,毕业文凭。

★★主营项目:
◆办理真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,免费申请货后付款,不成功不收费!!!)

◆办理教育部国外学历学位认证。(网上可查、永久存档、快速稳妥,回国发展,考公务员,落户,进国企,外企,创业,无忧愁)

◆办理各国各大学文凭(世界名校一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)

◆提供整套申请学校材料

◆可以提供钢印、水印、烫金、激光防伪、凹凸版、最新版大学毕业证、真实大使馆教育部留信认证,100%让您绝对放心满意。

【真实可查】---【永久存档】---【安全可靠】---【值得信赖】

八年从业经验,专业指导,私人定制,倾心为您解决留学毕业回国各种疑难问题

教育部学历学位认证服务:

做到真实永久存档,网上轻易可查,绝对对客户的资料进行保密,登录核实后再付款。


留信认证的作用:


2:同时对留学生所学专业等级给予评定。

3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书

4:这个入网证书并且可以归档到地方

5:凡是获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内,将在公安部网内查询个人身份证信息后,同步读取人 才网入库信息。

6:个人职称评审加20分。

7:个人信誉贷款加10分。

8:在国家人才网主办的全国网络招聘大会中纳入资料,供国家500强等高端企业选择人才。

国外学历提升买文凭Q/微信29304199堪萨斯大学文凭 KU毕业证成绩单学历认证修改GPA成绩雅思成绩单学位证书offer,在读证明/留信认证/WSE认证/ University of Kansas

$
0
0

国外学历提升买文凭Q/微信29304199堪萨斯大学文凭 KU毕业证成绩单学历认证修改GPA成绩雅思成绩单学位证书offer,在读证明/留信认证/WSE认证/ University of Kansas

QQ/微信29304199办理毕业证,成绩单,教育部留信认证,使馆认证,回国人员证明,修改成绩单+信封申请学校,offer录取通知书,在读证明,大学学位证书,毕业文凭。

★★主营项目:
◆办理真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,免费申请货后付款,不成功不收费!!!)

◆办理教育部国外学历学位认证。(网上可查、永久存档、快速稳妥,回国发展,考公务员,落户,进国企,外企,创业,无忧愁)

◆办理各国各大学文凭(世界名校一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)

◆提供整套申请学校材料

◆可以提供钢印、水印、烫金、激光防伪、凹凸版、最新版大学毕业证、真实大使馆教育部留信认证,100%让您绝对放心满意。

【真实可查】---【永久存档】---【安全可靠】---【值得信赖】

八年从业经验,专业指导,私人定制,倾心为您解决留学毕业回国各种疑难问题

教育部学历学位认证服务:

做到真实永久存档,网上轻易可查,绝对对客户的资料进行保密,登录核实后再付款。


留信认证的作用:


2:同时对留学生所学专业等级给予评定。

3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书

4:这个入网证书并且可以归档到地方

5:凡是获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内,将在公安部网内查询个人身份证信息后,同步读取人 才网入库信息。

6:个人职称评审加20分。

7:个人信誉贷款加10分。

8:在国家人才网主办的全国网络招聘大会中纳入资料,供国家500强等高端企业选择人才。

国外学历提升买文凭Q/微信29304199内布拉斯大学林肯分校文凭UNL毕业证成绩单学历认证修改GPA成绩雅思成绩单学位证书offer,在读证明/留信认证/WSE认证/University of Nebraska Lincoln

$
0
0

国外学历提升买文凭Q/微信29304199内布拉斯大学林肯分校文凭UNL毕业证成绩单学历认证修改GPA成绩雅思成绩单学位证书offer,在读证明/留信认证/WSE认证/University of Nebraska Lincoln

QQ/微信29304199办理毕业证,成绩单,教育部留信认证,使馆认证,回国人员证明,修改成绩单+信封申请学校,offer录取通知书,在读证明,大学学位证书,毕业文凭。

★★主营项目:
◆办理真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,免费申请货后付款,不成功不收费!!!)

◆办理教育部国外学历学位认证。(网上可查、永久存档、快速稳妥,回国发展,考公务员,落户,进国企,外企,创业,无忧愁)

◆办理各国各大学文凭(世界名校一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)

◆提供整套申请学校材料

◆可以提供钢印、水印、烫金、激光防伪、凹凸版、最新版大学毕业证、真实大使馆教育部留信认证,100%让您绝对放心满意。

【真实可查】---【永久存档】---【安全可靠】---【值得信赖】

八年从业经验,专业指导,私人定制,倾心为您解决留学毕业回国各种疑难问题

教育部学历学位认证服务:

做到真实永久存档,网上轻易可查,绝对对客户的资料进行保密,登录核实后再付款。


留信认证的作用:


2:同时对留学生所学专业等级给予评定。

3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书

4:这个入网证书并且可以归档到地方

5:凡是获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内,将在公安部网内查询个人身份证信息后,同步读取人 才网入库信息。

6:个人职称评审加20分。

7:个人信誉贷款加10分。

8:在国家人才网主办的全国网络招聘大会中纳入资料,供国家500强等高端企业选择人才。


国外学历提升买文凭Q/微信29304199北弗吉尼亚大学文凭UNV毕业证成绩单学历认证修改GPA成绩雅思成绩单学位证书offer,在读证明/留信认证/WSE认证/University of Northern Virginia

$
0
0

国外学历提升买文凭Q/微信29304199北弗吉尼亚大学文凭UNV毕业证成绩单学历认证修改GPA成绩雅思成绩单学位证书offer,在读证明/留信认证/WSE认证/University of Northern Virginia

QQ/微信29304199办理毕业证,成绩单,教育部留信认证,使馆认证,回国人员证明,修改成绩单+信封申请学校,offer录取通知书,在读证明,大学学位证书,毕业文凭。

★★主营项目:
◆办理真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,免费申请货后付款,不成功不收费!!!)

◆办理教育部国外学历学位认证。(网上可查、永久存档、快速稳妥,回国发展,考公务员,落户,进国企,外企,创业,无忧愁)

◆办理各国各大学文凭(世界名校一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)

◆提供整套申请学校材料

◆可以提供钢印、水印、烫金、激光防伪、凹凸版、最新版大学毕业证、真实大使馆教育部留信认证,100%让您绝对放心满意。

【真实可查】---【永久存档】---【安全可靠】---【值得信赖】

八年从业经验,专业指导,私人定制,倾心为您解决留学毕业回国各种疑难问题

教育部学历学位认证服务:

做到真实永久存档,网上轻易可查,绝对对客户的资料进行保密,登录核实后再付款。


留信认证的作用:


2:同时对留学生所学专业等级给予评定。

3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书

4:这个入网证书并且可以归档到地方

5:凡是获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内,将在公安部网内查询个人身份证信息后,同步读取人 才网入库信息。

6:个人职称评审加20分。

7:个人信誉贷款加10分。

8:在国家人才网主办的全国网络招聘大会中纳入资料,供国家500强等高端企业选择人才。

国外学历提升买文凭Q/微信29304199旧金山艺术大学文凭AAU毕业证成绩单学历认证修改GPA成绩雅思成绩单学位证书offer,在读证明/留信认证/WSE认证/Academy of Art University

$
0
0

国外学历提升买文凭Q/微信29304199旧金山艺术大学文凭AAU毕业证成绩单学历认证修改GPA成绩雅思成绩单学位证书offer,在读证明/留信认证/WSE认证/Academy of Art University

QQ/微信29304199办理毕业证,成绩单,教育部留信认证,使馆认证,回国人员证明,修改成绩单+信封申请学校,offer录取通知书,在读证明,大学学位证书,毕业文凭。

★★主营项目:
◆办理真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,免费申请货后付款,不成功不收费!!!)

◆办理教育部国外学历学位认证。(网上可查、永久存档、快速稳妥,回国发展,考公务员,落户,进国企,外企,创业,无忧愁)

◆办理各国各大学文凭(世界名校一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)

◆提供整套申请学校材料

◆可以提供钢印、水印、烫金、激光防伪、凹凸版、最新版大学毕业证、真实大使馆教育部留信认证,100%让您绝对放心满意。

【真实可查】---【永久存档】---【安全可靠】---【值得信赖】

八年从业经验,专业指导,私人定制,倾心为您解决留学毕业回国各种疑难问题

教育部学历学位认证服务:

做到真实永久存档,网上轻易可查,绝对对客户的资料进行保密,登录核实后再付款。


留信认证的作用:


2:同时对留学生所学专业等级给予评定。

3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书

4:这个入网证书并且可以归档到地方

5:凡是获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内,将在公安部网内查询个人身份证信息后,同步读取人 才网入库信息。

6:个人职称评审加20分。

7:个人信誉贷款加10分。

8:在国家人才网主办的全国网络招聘大会中纳入资料,供国家500强等高端企业选择人才。

国外学历提升买文凭Q/微信29304199德克萨斯加州大学达拉斯分校文凭UTD毕业证成绩单学历认证修改GPA成绩雅思成绩单学位证书offer,在读证明/留信认证/WSE认证/The University of Texas at Dallas

$
0
0

国外学历提升买文凭Q/微信29304199德克萨斯加州大学达拉斯分校文凭UTD毕业证成绩单学历认证修改GPA成绩雅思成绩单学位证书offer,在读证明/留信认证/WSE认证/The University of Texas at Dallas

QQ/微信29304199办理毕业证,成绩单,教育部留信认证,使馆认证,回国人员证明,修改成绩单+信封申请学校,offer录取通知书,在读证明,大学学位证书,毕业文凭。

★★主营项目:
◆办理真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,免费申请货后付款,不成功不收费!!!)

◆办理教育部国外学历学位认证。(网上可查、永久存档、快速稳妥,回国发展,考公务员,落户,进国企,外企,创业,无忧愁)

◆办理各国各大学文凭(世界名校一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)

◆提供整套申请学校材料

◆可以提供钢印、水印、烫金、激光防伪、凹凸版、最新版大学毕业证、真实大使馆教育部留信认证,100%让您绝对放心满意。

【真实可查】---【永久存档】---【安全可靠】---【值得信赖】

八年从业经验,专业指导,私人定制,倾心为您解决留学毕业回国各种疑难问题

教育部学历学位认证服务:

做到真实永久存档,网上轻易可查,绝对对客户的资料进行保密,登录核实后再付款。


留信认证的作用:


2:同时对留学生所学专业等级给予评定。

3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书

4:这个入网证书并且可以归档到地方

5:凡是获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内,将在公安部网内查询个人身份证信息后,同步读取人 才网入库信息。

6:个人职称评审加20分。

7:个人信誉贷款加10分。

8:在国家人才网主办的全国网络招聘大会中纳入资料,供国家500强等高端企业选择人才。

Error When trying to Import the subcircuit Spice model into Cadence

$
0
0

Hi, 

Hope you are doing fine. I have read the forum and the post Tawna made here: https://community.cadence.com/cadence_blogs_8/b/rf/posts/tip-of-the-week-how-to-simulate-a-subcircuit-netlist-with-spectre-in-ade

I tried to import the Spice model into the Cadence based on that instructions but I cannot follow from the third step as it is totally different in my Cadence version probably. But I got the idea from the instructions and created a spiceText cellview, then saved it and it automatically created the symbol for me based on the pins and terminals. Then I am trying to use this symbol in another schematic to do some SP analysis in schematic. But, at the very first point I get the error for creating the netlist, so do you have any suggestion how can I import this amplifier spice model into my library (I have also attached my CDF menu screen shot which is different from what is mentioned in the instructions by Tawna): 

"generate netlist...

function ansCdlCompPrim redefined

function ansCdlCompPrim redefined

Begin Incremental Netlisting Mar 22 16:34:00 2021

ERROR (OSSHNL-116): Unable to descend into any of the views defined in the view list, 'spectre veriloga ahdl cmos_sch schematic', for the

instance 'I0' in cell 'PAD115_tb'. Add one of these views to the cell 'PAD115' in the

library 'Non_Foster_Circuit', or modify the view list so that it contains an existing view.

End netlisting Mar 22 16:34:00 2021

ERROR (OSSHNL-514): Netlist generation failed because of the errors reported above. The netlist might not have been generated at all, or the generated netlist could be corrupt. Fix the reported errors and regenerate the netlist.

      ...unsuccessful."

Problem Simulating Noise Figure of Gm Cell (single Ended)

$
0
0

Hi,

I was trying to simulate the NF of simple Inverter (Which I will use as a gm-cell at the output of my switch-cap passive mixer). Unfortunately I am getting NF=46.48 dB for my circuit.

I have attached the necessary Photos of my circuit.  

Could anyone help me out regarding this?

Thanks

Viewing all 956 articles
Browse latest View live